Two seahorses mating
Grade 4
This lesson focuses on two main ideas:
Read the introduction to students and review new vocabulary. Students will watch the “Creatures of the Chesapeake” video. After the video, have a discussion around the essential questions and thinking questions aligned to the topic and video. Discuss the career connections related to the Chesapeake Bay and marine life with students.
Complete extension activities with students, as you see fit.
Have students apply their newfound knowledge by completing a Summative CER on the lesson using evidence from the video and activities as support.
Have students complete a reflection.
4-LS1-1 From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes
Construct an argument that plants and animals have internal and external structures that function to support survival, growth, behavior, and reproduction.
Standard 2
Human Dependence on Earth Systems and Natural Resources:
Environmentally literate students construct and apply understanding of how Earth’s systems and natural resources support human existence.
Construct an argument around how the unique structures of the lined seahorse and the oyster toadfish and their functions allow these sea creatures to survive better in the Chesapeake Bay. Use evidence and reasoning from the videos and activities to support your argument.
Choose one of the two Chesapeake Bay species: the lined seahorse or the oyster toadfish. Explain what makes this organism so special and different from other organisms of the Chesapeake Bay. Use evidence and reasoning from the videos and activities to support your argument.
Scoring Rubric Components | No Response Score Point 0 |
Not There Yet Score Point 0.5 |
Beginning To Score Point 0.75 |
Yes Score Point 1.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CLAIM | The claim is missing. | The claim is incorrect or irrelevant. | The claim partially takes a position on the topic or issue addressed within the prompt. | The claim takes an appropriate position on the topic or issue addressed within the prompt. |
EVIDENCE | There is no type of evidence in the response. | The evidence is irrelevant or does not support the claim. | The evidence partially supports the claim and demonstrates some understanding of the topic or text, using appropriate sources. | The evidence supports the claim and demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic or text, using appropriate sources. |
REASONING | There is no use of words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion and to clarify the relationship between the claim and evidence. | Use of words, phrases and clauses fail to show or explain any relationship between the claim and evidence. | Scientific words, phrases, and clauses used lack cohesion but partially clarify the relationship between the claim and evidence. | Appropriate scientific words, phrases, and clauses are used to create cohesion and to clarify the relationship between the claim and evidence. |
This learning resource is a production of Maryland Public Television/Thinkport.