Wendel Patrick, professor of Hip Hop at Johns Hopkins University, Peabody Conservatory in Baltimore, Maryland
Grades 9-12
This lesson focuses on two main ideas:
The ideas presented in this lesson are intended to be elaborated upon and scaffolded to adequately meet the standards for each grade level.
Read the introduction to students and review new vocabulary. Students will watch the “Artworks: The Art of Curation - Execution featuring Musician Wendel Patrick” video clip. After the video, have a discussion around the essential questions and thinking questions aligned to the topic and video.
Complete extension activities with students, as you see fit.
Have students apply their newfound knowledge by completing a summative assessment of the lesson using evidence from the video and activities as support.
Have students complete a reflection.
The ideas presented in this lesson are intended to be elaborated upon and scaffolded to adequately meet the standards. All grade levels should be creating, performing, and responding to music to fully meet the standards.
Students should be working independently to research and cite sources in order to explain and justify how art functions as a form of personal, societal, cultural, historical, political, and ethical communication and expression.
Anchor Standard 10
Synthesize and relate knowledge and personal experiences to make art.
Anchor Standard 11
Relate artistic ideas and works with societal, cultural, and historical context to deepen understanding.
Discuss how sampling connects different musical eras and what this means for the evolution of music. Use evidence from the video and activities to support your argument. Describe how these samples have either changed the context of the original music or enhanced the new song.
Use programs like GarageBand, Audacity, or any online mixing tool to create a short song (1-2 minutes) that mixes samples from different times in music history. Also, make a presentation to explain why you chose those samples, any historical significance of the original music, how you used these samples in your new song, and what you want your song to express or make people feel.
Scoring Rubric Components | No Response Score Point 0 |
Not There Yet Score Point 0.5 |
Beginning To Score Point 0.75 |
Yes Score Point 1.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CLAIM | The claim is missing. | The claim is incorrect or irrelevant. | The claim partially takes a position on the topic or issue addressed within the prompt. | The claim takes an appropriate position on the topic or issue addressed within the prompt. |
EVIDENCE | There is no type of evidence in the response. | The evidence is irrelevant or does not support the claim. | The evidence partially supports the claim and demonstrates some understanding of the topic or text, using appropriate sources. | The evidence supports the claim and demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic or text, using appropriate sources. |
REASONING | There is no use of words, phrases, and/or clauses to create cohesion and to clarify the relationship between the claim and evidence. | The use of words, phrases, and clauses fails to show or explain any relationship between the claim and evidence. | Scientific words, phrases, and clauses used lack cohesion but partially clarify the relationship between the claim and evidence. | Appropriate scientific words, phrases, and clauses are used to create cohesion and to clarify the relationship between the claim and evidence. |
This learning resource is a production of Maryland Public Television/Thinkport.